Some books should be reread at various stages of your life, not only to view the book differently, but to view the world differently.
Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy is one of those books.
As a teen I thought this book wildly romantic. A tragic tale filled with noble nobles; and I didn’t fully understand why the peasants were so upset.
In my 20s I thought Anna Karenina was a narcissistic neurotic birdbrain; the nobles pompous gits; and the peasants noble.
Now, in my 40s I decided to read this again, so I borrowed the recent Oxford University Press version, an inspiring and edifying translation with notes and a wonderful introduction by Rosamund Bartlett from Netgalley.com for the low price of an honest review. As the pages flew by I realized how differently I now see the novel as well as the complicated navigation of life’s path. The message that finding happiness without causing damage or destruction is so clear, though easier said than done, and for Anna Karenina, apparently impossible. Trapped in a loveless marriage, surrounded by sociopolitical upheaval, and bound by the brutal intolerance and hypocrisy of society, she made poor choices.
No idea how I will see this years from now.
Rosamund Bartlett’s patient guidance through the troubled waters of Tolstoy’s complicated soul offers generations a chance to experience the passion and progress, still relevant today. Translations of Tolstoy can be thorny, his remarkable ability to link realist and modern writing to emphasize differing attitudes and lifestyles can be difficult to communicate without altering or losing his viewpoint.
There have also been many visions of this classic presented on film. The latest adaptation by director Joe Wright, screenplay by Tom Stoppard starring Keira Knightley, Jude Law, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson was a sumptuous delight for the senses, yet in the 1927 silent film, Love starring Greta Garbo and John Gilbert had a consummate romance and depth of despair that spoke volumes.
All in all, maybe Anna Karenina should have taken a bus.
Too much drama for my liking, but then, i read it when i was 16…
LikeLike
It is definitely dramatic… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your last line made me giggle but maybe she should have. 😀
LikeLike
Don’t know if it would have changed the ending, but…worth a try. 😉
LikeLike
😀 😀
LikeLike
You are right. But I read and everyone keeps writing. Rereading doesn’t happen much. I like your point. Hugs, Barbara
LikeLike
Sometimes, for me, rereading can almost be like new reading if it’s been long enough. lol Aging is fun… 😉 Hugs, Donna
LikeLike
I could barely get through one time I can’t imagine reading it again. I think I’ll catch the movie. I read this book just a few years ago, in my teens I read the cliffnotes for school. I found it to be extremely long and she was very vain. I felt bad her son had to suffer his parents roller coaster ride. Loveless marriages exist till this day I just wish people used better options.
LikeLike
Anna was certainly a complicated character and I think suffered from the same malady as many suffer – wanting more, fearing they’re missing out. I too felt sorry for their son, children shouldn’t carry the burden of their parent’s issues, ever.
Hope this weekend treats you kindly. 🙂
LikeLike